WHAT MOVES SCORES
Rebuttals matter — when they bring evidence.
In an analysis of ICLR 2025, about 23% of reviews increased after the rebuttal and about 1% decreased. Evidence-backed clarifications were linked to increases; generic defenses were not.
FREE · NO SIGN-IN · CALIBRATED ON ICLR 2026 OUTCOMES
Enter the ratings your reviewers gave. We compare the mean with 19,474 reviewed ICLR 2026 submissions and their final decisions.
Example: 6, 4, 6, 4. Pre- or post-rebuttal scores both work.
One reviewer moving up a notch (+0.5 on the mean) would put you in the 5.5–6.0 band, where 81% were accepted at ICLR 2026. That is what a good rebuttal is for.
Coloured bar: share accepted among decided papers. Grey bar: number of submissions in the band. Withdrawn and desk-rejected papers are excluded from acceptance rates. Overall acceptance: 38% of decided papers.
WHAT MOVES SCORES
In an analysis of ICLR 2025, about 23% of reviews increased after the rebuttal and about 1% decreased. Evidence-backed clarifications were linked to increases; generic defenses were not.
SCIME REBUTTAL ROOM
Import your OpenReview reviews, get a response plan per concern with matching manuscript edits, assign co-authors, stay within the character limit, and keep a camera-ready to-do list of what you promised.
Ratings and decisions come from public ICLR 2026 OpenReview data (19,474 submissions with reviews, 14,175 with a final decision). We group papers by mean rating in 0.5-wide bands and report how many in each band were accepted. This describes past outcomes, not a prediction for your paper: area chairs weigh review content, confidence and discussion, not just the mean. Your ratings are processed in your browser and never sent to scime.
During the ICLR 2027 review season, the score distribution is read from public OpenReview reviews at most every 6 hours. Only counts are kept: no titles, authors or review text. Until ICLR 2027 reviews are public, or if they cannot be read, the page shows ICLR 2026.