ACL, EMNLP and NAACL submission checklist
15 things to check before you submit to ACL, EMNLP and NAACL. scime checks all of them on your LaTeX project — page count on the compiled PDF, every reference against arXiv, DBLP, Crossref and OpenAlex — in about a minute.
Key rules at a glance
- Main text, submission
- 8 pages (references and appendix not counted)
- Main text, camera-ready
- 9 pages
- Review
- Double-blind: no author names, self-identifying links or acknowledgments
- Limitations
- Required. ACL venues require a Limitations section (it does not count toward the page limit).
- Official rules
- github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files
Rules change between years. The official call for papers always wins; tell us if something here is out of date (contact@latenticlabs.com).
ACL, EMNLP and NAACL rules
- Main text fits in 8 pages for review (9 for the camera-ready version)
Measured on the compiled PDF up to the references. Over-length submissions can be desk-rejected.
- The official ACL, EMNLP and NAACL style file is used, in submission (review) mode
Submission mode keeps the author names hidden; the camera-ready option shows them.
- Limitations is included
ACL venues require a Limitations section (it does not count toward the page limit).
Anonymity (double-blind review)
- No first-person references to your own prior work
Write “Smith et al. (2024) showed…”, not “in our previous work”.
- Code and model links are anonymized
A github.com or huggingface.co link to your account reveals who you are; use an anonymous mirror.
- No acknowledgments or \thanks footnotes
Funding and affiliation notes identify the authors; add them back for the camera-ready version.
- The PDF has no author metadata or email addresses
hyperref’s pdfauthor and stray emails survive in the compiled file.
References
- Every \cite key has a bibliography entry
Missing keys print as [?] in the PDF.
- Each arXiv ID and DOI points to the paper you meant
Copied BibTeX often carries the ID of a different paper.
- Every cited paper exists, with the right title and authors
Each entry is looked up on arXiv, DBLP, Crossref and OpenAlex; AI-suggested references are the usual culprit.
Missing items and LaTeX slips
- Every \ref points to an existing \label
Broken cross-references print as ?? in the PDF.
- No leftover TODO, FIXME or highlighted text
Reviewers notice; so do area chairs.
- Every figure and table has a caption, a label and a mention in the text
Unreferenced floats read as unfinished work.
- No unescaped % after a number
In LaTeX, 41% starts a comment and silently deletes the rest of the line.
- No repeated words, a/an slips or mixed spellings
Cheap to fix, and they shape a reviewer’s first impression.
Run the whole checklist on your paper
Upload your Overleaf ZIP or start from the ACL, EMNLP and NAACL template. The free plan shows how many issues each check finds; a Submission pass shows every issue with its line and adds AI proofreading. Not ready to upload? Try it on our example paper, which has deliberate mistakes.